Te Kete Ipurangi Navigation:

Te Kete Ipurangi
Communities
Schools

Te Kete Ipurangi user options:


You are here:

Filter By:

Applied filters

  • Subject: Cultural contexts [x]
  • Publisher: te [x]
  • Clear all [x]
Author
Year
Type

Publications

Search Data

S. Bateman & M. Berryman (2007) He hui whakatika: Culturally responsive, self determining interventions for restoring harmony.. Ministry of Education Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga

Discusses the hui as a culturally appropriate strategy for discipline and restorative justice. Details the phases of engagement in the process. Highlights the role of kaitakawaenga (facilitator) working collaboratively with whānau members to seek resolution and restore harmony. Kairaranga, Issue 1, Volume 9, 6-12.

T. Cavanagh & L. Teddy & D. O’Sullivan & M. Berryman & R. Bishop (2007) The Experiences of Year 4 and 5 Māori students in Primary School Classrooms. Final Report to the Ministry of Education. Ministry of Education Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga

This report (2007) explores factors that influence student achievement as experienced by Year 4 and 5 Māori students in mainstream primary schools. It draws on a series of in-depth interviews with Māori students themselves and those most intimately involved with their education.

R.Bishop & M. Berryman & T.Cavanagh & L.Teddy (2007) Te Kotahitanga Phase 3 Whānaungatanga: Establishing a Culturally Responsive Pedagogy of Relations in Mainstream Secondary School Classrooms.. Ministry of Education Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga

The overall aim of this project has been to investigate how to improve the educational achievement of Māori students in mainstream secondary school classrooms.

A. Powell & L. Teddy (2007) Te Kotahitanga: Improving the educational achievement of Māori students in mainstream education Phase 2: Towards a whole school approach.. Ministry of Education Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga

This research project builds on the Te Kotahitanga research and professional development project. It examines what happens when the professional development project is implemented in the whole school rather than a small number of teachers in a school. Other reports can be found via the Te Kotahitanga publications home page.

R. Bishop & C. Richardson & S. Tiakiwai & Berryman, (2003) Te Kotahitanga: The Experiences of Year 9 and 10 Māori Students in Mainstream Classrooms. Report to the Ministry of Education. Ministry of Education Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga

This research project sought to investigate, by talking with Māori students (and other participants in their education), what was involved in improving their educational achievement. On the basis of these suggestions from the students, the research team developed an Effective Teaching Profile.

R. Bishop & M. Berryman & C. Richardson (2001) Te Toi Huarewa: Effective teaching and learning strategies, and effective teaching materials for improving the reading and writing in Te Reo Māori of students aged five to nine in Māori medium education: Final report to the Ministry of Education.. Ministry of Education Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga

Te Toi Huarewa looks at effective teaching and learning strategies, and effective teaching materials for improving the reading and writing in te reo Māori of students aged five to nine in Māori-medium education. The main purpose of the project was to observe and collaboratively reflect upon the teaching and learning strategies used during literacy programmes by a range of year one to year five Māori-medium classroom teachers who were identified as effective.

T. Glynn & C. Richardson & M. Berryman & R. Bishop (2001) Diagnostic assessment tools in Māori medium education: Stocktake and preliminary evaluation: Final report to the Ministry of Education (2001). Ministry of Education Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga

The purpose of the stocktake/evaluation was “to determine which Māori-medium diagnostic tools are currently used in New Zealand to assess student’s achievement in reading, writing and mathematics in the first 4 to 5 years of instruction.” The study also sought to identify gaps in current provisions and potential areas for development.

Back to top


Footer: